Strategic Arms Reduction Talks (START I) Treaty I at Political Glossary
What is it? A nuclear weapons treaty signed by the Soviet Union and the United States in 1991 and later re-signed with Belarus, Kazakhstan, Russia, and Ukraine that will limit Russia and the United States to 1,600 delivery vehicles and 6,000 strategic explosive nuclear devices each, with the other three countries destroying their nuclear weapons or transferring them to Russia.Political Definition Added By: Alexandra
The Strategic Arms Reduction Talks (START I) Treaty I definition has been viewed 162 Time(s)!
Send To Friends!
If you'd like to send the Strategic Arms Reduction Talks (START I) Treaty I definition to yourself or to your friends/colleagues, just enter the e-mail addresses in the boxes below -We hope you now understand the meaning of Strategic Arms Reduction Talks (START I) Treaty I. If you need any more information on this term, please don't hesitate to contact us.
Other Similar Political Terms:
Political Term Regulations is Under the authority of an Act of Parliament, the technical, administrative or regulatory rules required for the operation of legislation.Political Term legislation committee is a standing committee of the Senate which inquires into bills, estimates, annual reports and performances of government agencies
Political Term Sergeant at Arms is Custodian of the mace which symbolizes the authority of the Speaker in the house. The Sergeant at Arms is also responsible for the furniture, fittings and security in the house and in the Legislative Building and grounds.
Political Term Cross Bench is The seats occupied by Members of the Legislative Assembly (MLAs) who are neither Government nor Opposition members (independent or minor, non-aligned parties). Usually between the Government and Opposition benches. See also backbench; frontbench.
Political Term Plessy Vs. Ferguson (1896) is The plaintiff challenged a Louisiana statue requiring that railroads provide separate accommodations for blacks and whites. The Court found that separate but equal accommodations did not violate the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Rul